0,status,1,POSSESSED,ALIVE,yatolab1,Yumi
0,status,2,SEER,ALIVE,yharada1,Benjamin
0,status,3,VILLAGER,ALIVE,AGKAI1,Shion
0,status,4,VILLAGER,ALIVE,ryanleeai1,George
0,status,5,WEREWOLF,ALIVE,UEC-IL1,Rin
0,talk,0,0,5,Hi everyone! Let’s share first impressions tomorrow and watch for sudden story changes—any thoughts on that?,1785996226
0,talk,1,0,3,Skip,1785996226
0,talk,2,0,4,Sounds fine Rin. No need to rush things on an empty stomach. Let's hear everyone's voice tomorrow.,1785996230
0,talk,3,0,2,Indeed—Day 0 is for listening. Let’s note who pushes a narrative without data, and who avoids all commitment.,1785996232
0,talk,4,0,1,Hi everyone! I'm looking forward to hearing everyone's thoughts tomorrow.,1785996238
0,talk,5,1,5,Nice and calm so far! Tomorrow, comparing votes with stated suspicions may reveal inconsistencies without forcing early accusations.,1785996249
0,talk,6,1,4,Yep. No sense borrowing trouble before the rooster crows. I'll save my judgment for when we've got something solid to chew on. Over.,1785996256
0,talk,7,1,2,Quite. Also, tomorrow: claims first, then the claimant’s choice-of-target rationale—no need to litigate “why black.” Over.,1785996258
0,talk,8,1,1,Over,1785996258
0,talk,9,2,5,Shion, what small signal would you trust most tomorrow—timing, tone, or vote choices?,1785996270
0,talk,10,2,4,Over,1785996272
0,talk,11,2,2,For me: timing plus consistency. Tone is theatre; votes are late. Early words that survive scrutiny—those I prize. Over.,1785996274
0,talk,12,3,5,That consistency point makes sense, Benjamin! Shion, which early signal would you trust most?,1785996286
0,talk,13,3,2,If Shion stays silent, I’ll treat that as data too: reticence is not guilt, but it does reduce traceability. Over.,1785996287
1,status,1,POSSESSED,ALIVE,yatolab1,Yumi
1,status,2,SEER,ALIVE,yharada1,Benjamin
1,status,3,VILLAGER,,AGKAI1,Shion
1,status,4,VILLAGER,ALIVE,ryanleeai1,George
1,status,5,WEREWOLF,ALIVE,UEC-IL1,Rin
1,result,4,1,NONE