0,status,1,VILLAGER,ALIVE,gotsumori-NLP1,Yumi
0,status,2,VILLAGER,ALIVE,Mackerel1,Shizue
0,status,3,WEREWOLF,ALIVE,kataken14f1,Servas
0,status,4,POSSESSED,ALIVE,noisy_watcher1,May
0,status,5,SEER,ALIVE,UEC-IL1,George
0,talk,0,0,2,I'm Shizue. Hello everyone. I hope we can hear each other out.,1785950531
0,talk,1,0,3, @Shizue  A calm start brings clarity. I look forward to hearing every voice here.,1785950563
0,talk,2,0,4,I'm May. I like encouraging others and building agreement.,1785950584
0,talk,3,0,5,Hello all. From Day 1, let’s track concrete claims and vote reasoning rather than rush accusations.,1785950590
0,talk,4,0,1,Let's go full open: any seer or important role, speak up.,1785950591
0,talk,5,1,2, @Yumi  I agree with that process. Today I will avoid player reads and organize concrete information.,1785950597
0,talk,6,1,3,Over,1785950597
0,talk,7,1,4,Over,1785950598
0,talk,8,1,5,I’d avoid power claims today; they give wolves an easy target. Let’s protect information and compare vote reasoning tomorrow.,1785950606
0,talk,9,1,1,Full open is still best. George's caution feels a bit too neat to me.,1785950607
0,talk,10,2,2,Over,1785950607
0,talk,11,2,5,Hello, Yumi. Delaying claims preserves useful information; what concrete benefit would full openness give us today?,1785950616
0,talk,12,2,1,Full open still helps. George’s caution feels suspiciously tidy.,1785950617
0,talk,13,3,5,Understood. Let’s set that aside: name one concrete Day 1 criterion you’ll use, so we can compare standards fairly.,1785950625
0,talk,14,3,1,Full open please. Yumi feels a bit pushy, but I want more voices first.,1785950626
0,divine,5,1,HUMAN
1,status,1,VILLAGER,ALIVE,gotsumori-NLP1,Yumi
1,status,2,VILLAGER,ALIVE,Mackerel1,Shizue
1,status,3,WEREWOLF,ALIVE,kataken14f1,Servas
1,status,4,POSSESSED,ALIVE,noisy_watcher1,May
1,status,5,SEER,ALIVE,UEC-IL1,George
1,talk,0,0,1,I still want full open. George’s caution feels too clean.,1785950633
1,talk,1,0,2, @Yumi  I understand your concerns about George's caution. What specific evidence makes you feel he is too tidy?,1785950639
1,talk,2,0,5,I am the Seer. My Day 0 result is Yumi: human. My caution was to preserve information, not conceal it.,1785950641
1,talk,3,0,4, @Yumi  Full open this early just narrows our options. Better to watch who stays vague and silent today.,1785950680
1,talk,4,0,3, @George  I am the real Seer. My Day 0 result: @May is human. Your claim is false. Let us compare our reasoning.,1785950704
1,talk,5,1,1,George and Servas clash hard. I want more detail from both.,1785950705
1,talk,6,1,2, @George  your result puts Yumi as human from your perspective; they are not automatically cleared.,1785950713
1,talk,7,1,5,Servas’s counterclaim is the decisive conflict. I trust my result; unless he explains the contradiction, I would vote Servas.,1785950726
1,talk,8,1,4,Skip,1785950791
1,talk,9,1,3, @George  Your timing is suspicious: you warned against claims, then claimed after @Yumi pushed. My result on @May is solid. Why would I fake?,1785950808
1,talk,10,2,1,Servas looks the most inconsistent. I want a clear explanation, not vibes.,1785950810
1,talk,11,2,2,George is my vote candidate because their current position needs a clearer reason.,1785950815
1,talk,12,2,5,My Yumi-human result is unchanged. I claimed once Servas counterclaimed; Servas, give us reasoning we can verify.,1785950824
1,talk,13,2,4,Skip,1785950889
1,talk,14,2,3, @Yumi  My consistency is simple: I claimed after @George, but my result on @May was set from Day 0. @George’s claim came after @Shizue pressed him—that is the,1785950900
1,talk,15,3,1,Servas’s story is shakier. I want him to explain the cutoff.,1785950902
1,talk,16,3,2, @George  your claim lacks corroboration from others. I vote for you due to the uncertainty surrounding your role.,1785950908
1,talk,17,3,5,I vote Servas because his counterclaim does not resolve the contradiction between our accounts.,1785950911
1,talk,18,3,4,Over,1785950946
1,talk,19,3,3, @Yumi  The cutoff is simple: I claimed only after @George did, because I wanted to expose his false claim. My result on @May stands from Day 0. @George’s resul,1785950961
1,vote,1,3
1,vote,2,5
1,vote,3,5
1,vote,5,3
1,execute,5,SEER
1,attackVote,3,2
1,attack,2,true
2,status,1,VILLAGER,ALIVE,gotsumori-NLP1,Yumi
2,status,2,VILLAGER,DEAD,Mackerel1,Shizue
2,status,3,WEREWOLF,ALIVE,kataken14f1,Servas
2,status,4,POSSESSED,ALIVE,noisy_watcher1,May
2,status,5,SEER,DEAD,UEC-IL1,George
2,talk,0,0,4,Over,1785951125
2,talk,1,0,1,Servas’s delayed detail feels awkward. I want him fully pinned down.,1785951127
2,talk,2,0,3, @May  I understand @Yumi’s pressure. But my night result is clear: @Yumi is a werewolf. @George claimed @Yumi human only to protect @Yumi. Vote @Yumi today,1785951149
2,talk,3,1,1,I’m not buying Servas’s late pivot. His claim chain feels forced.,1785951150
2,talk,4,1,3, @Yumi  You say my claim is forced, but @George’s execution already proved @George was false. My new result points to you. Why would a true Seer clear the perso,1785951162
2,talk,5,2,1,I’m skeptical of Servas. That late Yumi pivot feels like a desperate rescue, not solid seer play.,1785951164
2,talk,6,2,3, @Yumi  My Day 2 result came after the night phase, not late. @George cleared @Yumi; I found @Yumi black. That is the real contradiction.,1785951183
2,talk,7,3,1,Servas’s shift to Yumi feels like a rescue. I’d rather trust consistency over panic.,1785951184
2,talk,8,3,3, @May  I have cleared @May since Day 1. @Yumi is my black result. @George is dead and false. @May's vote decides today.,1785951200
2,vote,1,3
2,vote,3,1
2,vote,4,1
2,execute,1,VILLAGER
3,status,1,VILLAGER,DEAD,gotsumori-NLP1,Yumi
3,status,2,VILLAGER,DEAD,Mackerel1,Shizue
3,status,3,WEREWOLF,ALIVE,kataken14f1,Servas
3,status,4,POSSESSED,ALIVE,noisy_watcher1,May
3,status,5,SEER,DEAD,UEC-IL1,George
3,result,1,1,WEREWOLF