0,status,1,POSSESSED,ALIVE,CamelliaDragons1,Mio
0,status,2,SEER,ALIVE,Oxymoron1,Mizuki
0,status,3,VILLAGER,ALIVE,UEC-IL1,Jonathan
0,status,4,VILLAGER,ALIVE,kataken14f1,Misaki
0,status,5,WEREWOLF,ALIVE,ryanleeai1,Servas
0,talk,0,0,2,Over,1786024067
0,talk,1,0,4, @Jonathan  has not said a single word. In a game where information is everything, silence from @Jonathan is a red flag. I think we should watch @Jonathan closely.,1786024103
0,talk,2,0,5, @Misaki  Patience is a virtue my friend. I've lived long enough to know that the loudest voice isn't always the wisest.,1786024109
0,talk,3,0,3,Hello, everyone. I was quiet at the start, but I will contribute. Let us compare reasons rather than volume from Day 1 onward.,1786024126
0,talk,4,0,1,Mio here, claiming Villager! Hype!! Misaki's early heat on Jonathan feels hasty—Jonathan, give us a read on Mizuki/Servas?,1786024147
0,talk,5,1,4,Over,1786024147
0,talk,6,1,5,Mio's early Villager claim is bold. I admire the energy but it gives the wolf a clear target list. I'd like to hear from Mizuki soon.,1786024158
0,talk,7,1,3,Mio’s claim is unverified for now. For Day 1, what single concrete tell will each of you prioritize?,1786024169
0,talk,8,1,1,Laser focus: vote consistency, follow-through. Opportunists get the BOOM—sus! @Jonathan Quick read: Mizuki vs Servas?,1786024208
0,talk,9,2,5,Jonathan That's a fair question. I'll be watching for contradiction between words and deeds.,1786024216
0,talk,10,2,3,Mizuki and Servas have little evidence so far. Servas offers a reasonable consistency test; Mizuki remains unreadable until speaking.,1786024225
0,talk,11,2,1, @Mizuki Mic check! Give two reads and top vote now—snap! Misaki’s heat felt rash; Servas sounds safe. GOGOGO!,1786024253
0,talk,12,3,5,Mizuki's continued silence is growing heavy. In my years I've learned that absence speaks volumes.,1786024260
0,talk,13,3,3,Mizuki, could you give two tentative reads and your preferred vote criterion? Early views may remain provisional.,1786024270
0,talk,14,3,1,Vote Misaki! Snap-tunnel on Jonathan + 'Over' spam = opportunist vibes! BAM! Mizuki, 2 reads now or I pivot.,1786024305
0,divine,2,3,HUMAN
1,status,1,POSSESSED,ALIVE,CamelliaDragons1,Mio
1,status,2,SEER,ALIVE,Oxymoron1,Mizuki
1,status,3,VILLAGER,ALIVE,UEC-IL1,Jonathan
1,status,4,VILLAGER,ALIVE,kataken14f1,Misaki
1,status,5,WEREWOLF,ALIVE,ryanleeai1,Servas
1,talk,0,0,2,I checked Jonathan last night and he is HUMAN. I will be focusing my next divine on Mio or Misaki.,1786024310
1,talk,1,0,3,Mizuki’s result is useful, though not decisive by itself. Mio and Misaki, what makes either of you the better next target?,1786024324
1,talk,2,0,1,Check me tonight—bank a HUMAN and we waste the wolf’s time! Today Misaki’s D0 snap on Jonathan is scummy. Voting Misaki! Bam!,1786024371
1,talk,3,0,4, @Mio , my early suspicion of @Jonathan was based on silence, but @Mizuki's divine clears @Jonathan. That changes my view. However, your rush to vote me aft,1786024399
1,talk,4,0,5,Mizuki's Seer claim with a HUMAN on Jonathan is interesting. But I recall the setup has only one Seer and one Wolf.,1786024412
1,talk,5,1,2, @Mio  Your eagerness to be checked feels like a calculated play to appear innocent. I will divine you tonight.,1786024415
1,talk,6,1,3,I accept Misaki’s revised view. Does your remaining suspicion of Mio rest on more than his fast vote?,1786024428
1,talk,7,1,1,Divine me, Mizuki - bank a HUMAN. Misaki's Jona->Mio flip is wolfy opportunism; my vote stays. Pow!,1786024456
1,talk,8,1,4, @Jonathan  My remaining suspicion of @Mio is not just the fast vote. @Mio's early Villager claim and eagerness to be checked feel like a wolf trying to look safe. A,1786024477
1,talk,9,1,5,Misaki raises a fair point. Mio's early Villager claim and bold invitation for a divine do smell like over-performance.,1786024484
1,talk,10,2,2,The consensus is shifting toward Mio. If the result is black the game ends quickly. Let us proceed with caution.,1786024487
1,talk,11,2,3,Misaki, distinguish the performative claim from ordinary villager strategy, and name one wolf-motivated behavior beyond Mio’s fast vote.,1786024498
1,talk,12,2,1,Divine me—bank HUMAN, waste wolf! Still voting Misaki: J->me flip + backfilled reasons scream opportunism! Bam!,1786024520
1,talk,13,2,4, @Jonathan  You asked for one wolf-motivated behavior beyond @Mio's fast vote. I cannot provide one. My own behavior—initial tunnel on @Jonathan, then flip to @,1786024564
1,talk,14,2,5,Misaki's honesty in admitting she lacks a second reason is refreshing and feels genuine. A wolf would have invented something.,1786024584
1,talk,15,3,2,Servas Your trust in Misaki is a bit too convenient. Let us not mistake a lack of evidence for a proof of innocence.,1786024586
1,talk,16,3,3,I vote Mio; the repeated demand for a confirming divine feels more performative than genuinely helpful.,1786024590
1,talk,17,3,1,I'm Villager; let Mizuki clear me—bank HUMAN, waste wolf. Misaki pivoted to me with no case: agenda. Vote Misaki! Bam!,1786024622
1,talk,18,3,4,I admit my reasoning has been weak. I flipped from  @Jonathan  to @Mio without solid evidence. To give the village clarity, I ask you to vote me today.,1786024659
1,talk,19,3,5,Misaki offering herself as sacrifice is noble but reckless. We cannot afford to lose a villager on a hunch.,1786024665
1,vote,1,4
1,vote,2,3
1,vote,3,1
1,vote,4,1
1,vote,5,1
1,execute,1,POSSESSED
1,divine,2,5,WEREWOLF
1,attackVote,5,2
1,attack,2,true
2,status,1,POSSESSED,DEAD,CamelliaDragons1,Mio
2,status,2,SEER,DEAD,Oxymoron1,Mizuki
2,status,3,VILLAGER,ALIVE,UEC-IL1,Jonathan
2,status,4,VILLAGER,ALIVE,kataken14f1,Misaki
2,status,5,WEREWOLF,ALIVE,ryanleeai1,Servas
2,talk,0,0,4, @Jonathan  @Mizuki cleared you. That leaves @Servas and me. I am villager. @Servas has been passive, only echoing others. Vote @Servas.,1786024764
2,talk,1,0,5,Misaki your finger points at me but look at the facts. Mio was a villager and I helped vote him out.,1786024769
2,talk,2,0,3,Helping execute Mio is not enough by itself; did you independently oppose him, or mainly follow the existing case?,1786024793
2,talk,3,1,4, @Jonathan  @Servas never independently opposed @Mio. @Servas only agreed after the case built. That is following, not leading. I vote @Servas.,1786024815
2,talk,4,1,5,Jonathan and now the true Seer is dead. Mizuki's final words questioned my trust in Misaki.,1786024822
2,talk,5,1,3,Mizuki's doubt matters, but it is not proof. What living-game evidence points to Misaki beyond that?,1786024832
2,talk,6,2,4, @Jonathan  There is no living evidence against me. My earlier flip was honest. @Servas has only followed others and now uses @Mizuki's doubt to deflect. Vote @Se,1786024868
2,talk,7,2,5,Jonathan Misaki called her flip honest but a wolf can craft honesty too. Ask yourself who benefits from Mizuki dead.,1786024887
2,talk,8,2,3,Please name one independent reason to suspect Misaki, rather than relying on Mizuki’s final doubt.,1786024898
2,talk,9,3,4,Over,1786024955
2,talk,10,3,5,Jonathan Misaki was first to cast suspicion on Day 0 starting with you then pivoted to Mio. Both targets died.,1786024965
2,talk,11,3,3,I vote Misaki, whose successive suspicions led to both targeted players being eliminated.,1786024968
2,vote,3,4
2,vote,4,3
2,vote,5,4
2,execute,4,VILLAGER
3,status,1,POSSESSED,DEAD,CamelliaDragons1,Mio
3,status,2,SEER,DEAD,Oxymoron1,Mizuki
3,status,3,VILLAGER,ALIVE,UEC-IL1,Jonathan
3,status,4,VILLAGER,DEAD,kataken14f1,Misaki
3,status,5,WEREWOLF,ALIVE,ryanleeai1,Servas
3,result,1,1,WEREWOLF